Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 18:57
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Is there a possibility of call centres returning from outsourcing or offshoring in the future?
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Microsoft Starts Deleting Your Passwords In 6 Weeks—Act Now - Forbes
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Is Elon Musk an actual genius, or is he surrounded by people smarter than him?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
How do you fight the push and pull (manipulation) tactic if you want to win him?
What’s next?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Thank you.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Tesla after Trump - Financial Times
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Private Japanese spacecraft aims to land in the moon's 'Sea of Cold' this week - Space
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.